Monday, September 2, 2013

I GUESS IT’S UP TO US!



By Edwin Cooney

Last Wednesday was the fiftieth anniversary of the 1963 March on Washington for jobs and freedom.  The march was conceived by A. Philip Randolph.  Randolph opened the ceremony which was attended by an estimated 200,000 people and viewed on television by millions more.

A lot of Americans including Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina (then a Democrat who became a Republican when the party abandoned civil rights as a worthy issue), Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona (who would receive the Republican presidential nomination in 1964), Malcolm X (who referred to the march as “the farce on Washington"), and a seventeen-year-old know-it-all by the name of Edwin Cooney didn’t think the march was either necessary or that it would ultimately be significant.

Last Wednesday, fifty years later, a whole mess of people (some of the most prominent Republicans and Conservatives) still felt that the original march and especially last Wednesday’s celebration were not only unnecessary and insignificant, but downright nettlesome.  I heard a local Conservative talk show host categorize President Obama’s address as “a brilliantly arranged plate of crap.”

I, who now believe that it all did matter, celebrated in part by listening to a recording of the original ceremony.  The first voice on my recording is that of A. Philip Randolph.  (Asa was his given first name.)  He was a remarkable man.  Born in 1889 in Crescent City, Florida, Randolph was an early labor union organizer.  The son of a Baptist preacher, he spoke the English language as you’d imagine an Old Testament prophet would have done had Old Testament prophets spoken English. Randolph was 74 years old. Standing on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial that day, he said in his deep rich voice to the estimated 200,000 people who were gathered there:

“We are not a pressure group. We are not a mob. We are the advanced guard of a massive moral revolution for jobs and freedom. This revolution reverberates throughout the land touching every city, every town, and every village where black men are segregated, oppressed, and exploited. But this revolution is not confined to the negro or civil rights. For our white allies know that they can not be free while we are not. And we know that we have no future in a society in which six million people, black and white, are unemployed and millions more are living in poverty...”

The 1963 March on Washington for jobs and freedom wasn’t the first march on Washington that Randolph had conceived.  Back in 1941, Randolph, who was then president of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, had threatened such a march if President Franklin D. Roosevelt didn’t do something about racial discrimination in war industries.  So, he and Walter White, then the president of The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, paid the thrice-elected president a little visit.  In exchange for not exposing what would have been an embarrassing sign that America, even in a milder form, shared with Hitler’s Germany an abiding human prejudice, FDR agreed to sign Executive Order 8802 which was called the Fair Employment Act.  The act, however, merely banned discriminatory hiring practices against blacks by firms profiting from federal war production contracts.

After Randolph, John Lewis spoke. He was then chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.  Just 23 at the time, Lewis would be severely beaten on “Bloody Sunday” (March 7th, 1965), as he and Hosea Williams led 600 demonstrators across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in the first leg of a proposed march from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama.  He currently represents the people of Georgia’s 5th Congressional District and is the only speaker of that occasion still living.

Lewis was followed by Whitney M. Young Jr., Executive Director of the Urban League.  Young would go on to serve as president of the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) and to work productively for three presidents: Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon.  Young died on March 11th, 1971 while swimming in Lagos, Nigeria. President Nixon not only sent a plane to bring his body back to his home in Kentucky, but he also eulogized Young at his funeral.  During that eulogy, the president said, “[Whitney Young] knew how to accomplish things that other people were merely for.”

Roy Wilkins, Executive Director of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), next urged the Congress to be as brave as civil rights marchers, as daring as the nine black children who integrated Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas back in 1957 and as forthright on civil rights issues as North Carolina Governor Terry Sanford -- although he didn't specifically mention Sanford by name.

Then it was Dr. Martin Luther King’s turn -- and men and women all over the world have had a dream ever since. 

Dr. King was followed by Bayard Rustin, the Executive Director of the Congress of Racial Equality.  As a gay man, Rustin wasn’t welcome by some within the civil rights leadership.  A. Philip Randolph had conceived of the March on Washington, but Rustin had organized it.  Still, according to one source I read, Roy Wilkins of the NAACP resisted Rustin getting any publicity at all for the event.

The Reverend Dr. Benjamin E. Mays, who had served as president of Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia since 1940, closed the ceremony.  His most famous student was Martin Luther King.  Therefore, it was fitting that Dr. Mays not only closed the ceremony, but also delivered the eulogy at Dr. King’s funeral on April 6th, 1968.

Despite the passage of legislation knocking down the legal barriers blocking the realization of a myriad of human rights and opportunities since that historic occasion, there are those who will insist that such legislation had nothing to do with the March on Washington for jobs and freedom.  Furthermore, they will insist that the march shouldn't have mattered, since the prosperity of a free people is none of the government’s business.  At the same time, there are those who will trivialize the significance of both yesterday’s and today’s gatherings because there are so many gains yet to be made.

Hence, whether either yesterday or today really matters is ultimately up to us.  That means you and me!

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
EDWIN COONEY

No comments: